Saturday, January 20, 2018
Friday, January 19, 2018
Stargate
Thursday, January 18, 2018
Topper
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
In California
Saturday, January 13, 2018
Technicolor Snowflakes
Fruit and Veggies
Dunkirk
We saw a “new” movie tonight instead of a movie shot 50 years ago starring an imaginary spy. Dunkirk was real. It really happened in 1940. It showed real people fighting a real war. It showed war—the fear, grit, dirt, noise, and elation in the pure cold light of day. Somehow, after seeing the battles and hearing the guns from so many war movies, we still fight wars. When will we learn? Can we learn?
The movie intertwines 3 smaller stories of three Spitfire pilots, the crew of one small ship trying to save the stranded soldiers on the beach; and a few of the stranded soldiers. The three stories can stand alone, but together, they make the movie stronger. The music is tense, the dialog is sparse, with all the action happening in about a day.
Did I like the movie? Yes I did. Did I enjoy the movie? No I did not. But this is not a movie to enjoy. It’s a movie about war and war is not enjoyable.
The DVD comes with 2 discs. The second disc has many “special features” most of which are down right boring. I thought many of the vignettes were “inside baseball” of interest only to folks who want to know all the minutia that went into the making of the movie. Given that, there were 3 little gems...the interviews with some survivors of Dunkirk; how the thousands of uniforms were made; and how they created the crowds on the beach. If you buy the DVD, think seriously of not looking at the second disc.
Friday, January 12, 2018
BaseCamp
Thursday, January 11, 2018
For Your Eyes Only
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Tel Kitchen (aka The Plastic Bag Tel)
Tuesday, January 9, 2018
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
That Stuff Falling From the Sky is Rain
The weather guessers had it right...we had one heck of a storm last night...and it looks like more is coming.
Before the storm on December 30, the entrance to Harvey’s Cove looked like this...
Sunday, January 7, 2018
Blade Runner 2049
Tonight we saw Blade Runner 2049. The movie is a sequel to Blade Runner made in 1982. Both movies are directed by Ridley Scott and star Harrison Ford.
BR-I takes place in 2019 in a dystopian Los Angeles. I did not like that movie at all as it was too dark and grim. But, the other DrC is a science fiction buff and he liked the movie, so I’ve seen it several times as we have it on DVD (and VCR). We also own the video game. While that does not make me an expert in the Blade Runner World, it gave me the basic background that I needed to understand BR-II.
BR-II starts 30 years after the first one ended and the world is more bleak and dystopian (if that is possible). The sets are grimy with everything worn out, rusted, and used. The smoggy air is thick enough to cut. Worms are farmed for protein. Where hi tech is used, it’s relatively “shiny.” The storyline is basic...cop needs to find someone...he finds the person...the person gets an answer to an old question. If I tell you more, it will be a spoiler...and I don’t want to spoil the experience.
The movie has been out for a couple months, but we were unable to see it while we were cruising. I’m not sure how much longer it will be playing as the audience in the theater was pretty light. If you have seen BR-I, the movie will make sense. If you have not seen it, there will be a lot of loose ends to weave together in order for the movie to make sense. If you are fan of the Phillip Dick book, Blade Runner, and you’ve seen the first movie and you’ve played the various Blade Runner video games that are out there, the movie is a must see. If you are like me...not a fan, but a hanger-on, you might find the movie too long, the plot line too shallow and the view of the future too grim.
*Pictures courtesy of Wikipedia.
Thursday, January 4, 2018
The Last Jedi
I’ll start out with the good. Star War movies always have an interesting cast of creatures and non-human characters. The Last Jedi has many: The Porg is a bird-like creature with big sad ”puppy dog” eyes that is cute beyond cute. Snoke is the maximum bad guy of the First Order and he’s just plain ugly with rotten teeth and sinews for skin. His appearance shouts EVIL-BAD-NASTY-MEAN...you get the idea. There are fetching Fathiers that run fast like horses, and Vulptices (singular: vulptex) crystalline fox-like critters with excellent senses of smell and sight. The little round droid, BB-8, returns just as lovable as it was in episode 7. These characters are good additions to Star Wars panaply.
John Williams has again created a musical score that works with the movie. The special effects are also first class. But then, we have learned that a Star Wars movie has to have good music and effects.
If you are reading this carefully, you might note that I’ve not said anything about the story. That’s one of the “Bads.” The story is the Resistance fighting the First Order with the First Order winning. The First Order is filled to the brim with predictable “bad” guys while the Resistance is filled with “good” guys...also predictable. No new ground is covered with this plot line, yet old ground has been lost never to be seen again. Luke is gone, Leia is gone...and we are left with two newbies: Rey (good guy) and Kylo Ren (bad guy) to fight another day.
The flashbacks through time and space get confusing and sometimes I was left to wonder what really happened there as parts of the story are just plain missing. Why is the story so shallow?
So I like some of the creatures but I did not like the story. If you are a Star Wars fan, you need to see the movie. If you are new to the saga, wait for it to be released at RedBox.
*Picture courtesy of http://www.starwars.com/films/star-wars-episode-viii-the-last-jedi
Wednesday, January 3, 2018
Moonraker
Sometime ago we bought the boxed set of all of the James Bond movies. We’ve seen all the Sean Connery Bond movies and now we’re working on the rest. Tonight we saw Moonraker with Roger Moore as James.
It’s a set of action sequences in search of a plot. That’s not exactly right...there is a plot, but it’s weak, very weak. Meet one bad guy with the improbable name of Drax (now you know that might be short for Dracula ... but if not, it sounds evil from the start). Drax is a crazy multibillionaire who is making space shuttles among other things...and he has a plan to annihilate the people on our little blue planet and create a super race of perfect people to repopulate it. Of course we don’t find that out till the very end. In the meantime Bond is chasing around the world trying to find out what Drax is up to.
We have the requisite chase scene thru the canals in Venice with vaporettos and gondolas. Then there’s the confusion of Carnival in Rio with a chase and fight on a funicular hanging over the bay by Sugar Loaf. Don’t forget the jungle chase that has James gliding over Iguasu Falls and the bad guy rocketing his boat over the falls. Finally the ultimate scene of all...the space battle between the good guys (that’s the US) and the bad guys (Drax’s army). The good guys win...and the film ends with Bond and his lady floating in space...doing only what James Bond does so well.
The story is bad. Roger Moore’s acting is bad. The gadgets are good. The chases are good if not predictable. I found myself laughing out loud as it was just too preposterous to do anything else. Watch the movie for a good laugh. Don’t watch it for it’s excellence (or lack thereof) of plot.
Movies are time capsules showing off what is important for the time they were made. In 1979, when Moonraker was filmed, the US was working on the Space Shuttle program. The first shuttle, the Enterprise, had been built in 1976, but the program was not fully operational until 1981. Creating a James Bond story around this cutting technology was perfect. Putting the story in interesting and exotic locations was expected...and are there better locations than Venice, Rio, The Amazon and Space. It’s too bad that the writers did not create a good plot to tell the story.
What Is It?
Monday, January 1, 2018
Somewhere in the Ford Galaxie
The mid-year inclusion of the new 427-cu.in. powerhouses is what really sets collectors hearts on fire. With a 4.23 x 3.78-inch bore and stroke and an 11.5:1 compression ratio, a 427 equipped with a four-barrel thumps out 410hp and 476-lbs.ft. of torque (Q-code), while dual four-barrels result in a teeth-clenching 425hp and 480-lbs.ft. oftorque (R-code). This last example was installed in only 3,857 vehicles, according to Reynolds. 1963-1/2 Ford Galaxie 500XL Fastback from Hemmings Muscle Machines
May, 2007